Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 3535

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : January | Volume : 18 | Issue : 1 | Page : EC10 - EC15 Full Version

p53 Expression in Gallbladder Lesions: A Cross-sectional Study from a Tertiary Care Centre in Northern India


Published: January 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/66785.18967
Nazia Manzoor Walvir, Zubaida Rasool, Subrina Masoodi, Ashfaq UL Hassan, Abrar Habib Lone, Inara Abeer

1. Senior Resident, Department of Pathology, SKIMS, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India. 2. Professor, Department of Pathology, SKIMS, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India. 3. Senior Resident, Department of Pathology, SKIMS, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India. 4. Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, SKIMS, Bemina, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India. 5. Postgraduate, Department of Pathology, SKIMS, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India. 6. Senior Resident, Department of Pathology, SKIMS, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.

Correspondence Address :
Inara Abeer,
Senior Resident, Department of Pathology, SKIMS, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
E-mail: inarapathohamdard@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Gallbladder lesions comprise inflammatory, benign, pre-malignant, and malignant lesions. The progression of benign lesions into malignant ones involves a complex process. The p53 gene is commonly disrupted in carcinogenesis. Malignant lesions may exhibit p53 overexpression compared to benign and inflammatory lesions.

Aim: To investigate the distribution of gallbladder lesions and the expression of the p53 nuclear protein in these lesions.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Pathology, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, from June 2020 to December 2022. A total of 249 specimens of gallbladder lesions, including congenital, inflammatory, benign, pre-malignant, and malignant lesions, were included. All samples underwent Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining and Immunohistochemistry (IHC) with p53 antibody using the peroxidase-antiperoxidase method. The association of p53 expression with histopathological diagnosis was analysed using Fisher’s Exact test. The final analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software, version 25.0. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Out of 249 specimens, there were 217 (87.14%) inflammatory lesions, 9 (3.6%) benign lesions, 2 (0.8%) pre-malignant lesions, and 21 (9.26%) malignant lesions. The main inflammatory lesions were Chronic Cholecystitis (CC) with 132 cases (60.83%) and CC with cholesterosis with 36 cases (16.59%). The most common pre-malignant lesion was choledochal cyst with 3 cases (3.33%). Benign tumours (leiomyoma) were present in 2 (0.8%) patients. Among the 21 (8.46%) malignant tumours, 4 (19.05%) were moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, 13 (61.9%) were poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, and 4 (19.05%) were well-differentiated adenocarcinoma. p53 overexpression was significantly higher in patients with malignant tumours (9 cases, 42.86%) compared to inflammatory lesions (26 cases, 11.98%), benign lesions (0 cases, 0%), and pre-malignant lesions (0 cases, 0%) (p=0.003).

Conclusion: Gallbladder lesions exhibit a wide range of histopathological presentations. Inflammatory lesions are the most common, followed by pre-malignant and malignant lesions. p53 can serve as a novel marker for differentiating inflammatory lesions from malignant lesions in the gallbladder.

Keywords

Carcinoma, Immunohistochemistry, Novel marker, p53

Gallbladder diseases present with a diverse clinical and histopathological spectrum, including congenital, inflammatory, benign, pre-malignant, and malignant conditions (1). The most common pathology occurring in the gallbladder is cholelithiasis, followed by cholecystitis (2). Very few studies have been conducted on the North Indian population, and the frequency of gallbladder lesions, especially in the Jammu and Kashmir, is still unclear. There is a significant difference in gallbladder diseases between North India and South India (3).

The diagnosis of gallbladder lesions through radiological methods is not always accurate. The lesions may not be identified during pre-operative imaging. Gallbladder cancer is suspected preoperatively in about 20%-30% of all patients, while the remaining 70%-80% of cases are diagnosed intraoperatively or incidentally by the pathologist.

Simple cholecystectomy is the surgical treatment of choice for inflammatory and benign conditions. In the case of cancer, a simple cholecystectomy or an extended cholecystectomy with liver wedge resection may be curative. Adjuvant treatments, such as radiation, chemotherapy, or a combination, are necessary in advanced stages (4).

The histopathological examination of the specimen enables the correct diagnosis of both pre-malignant and malignant lesions. Therefore, it is crucial to evaluate histopathological changes to determine the occurrence and distribution of the lesions (5). Gallbladder cancer is suspected preoperatively in about 20%-30% of all patients, with the remaining 70%-80% of cases being diagnosed intraoperatively or incidentally by the pathologist. Simple cholecystectomy is the preferred surgical treatment for inflammatory and benign conditions. In cases of cancer, a simple cholecystectomy or an extended cholecystectomy with liver wedge resection may be curative. Adjuvant treatment such as radiation, chemotherapy, or a combination is necessary in advanced stages. Overall, the prognosis remains poor.

However, even histopathologically, there may be a diagnostic dilemma in differentiating certain pre-malignant lesions from malignant lesions (6). The evaluation of the association between chronic inflammatory conditions and carcinogenesis has shown that the disruption of the p53 gene is the most common mechanism, leading to the terminology of “Guardian of the Genome” (7). p53, a tumour suppressor gene, is present on the short arm of chromosome 17 and helps prevent the build-up of potentially destructive mutations in Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA). p53 plays a significant role in the initiation and progression of cancer (8). Moreover, the expression of p53 is significant in carcinogenesis in chronic inflammatory lesions like Chronic Cholecystitis (CC) (6),(8). Since it can be difficult to identify malignant transformation in inflammatory and pre-malignant lesions, recognition of p53 mutation through Immunohistochemistry (IHC) can help with diagnosis (9). Additionally, IHC analysis of p53 mutations in gallbladder lesions could be beneficial for screening, early detection of recurrence in the remaining biliary system, liver metastasis, and follow-up of high-risk patients (10),(11). Therefore, this study was undertaken to identify the distribution of the spectrum of gallbladder lesions (congenital, inflammatory, benign, pre-malignant, and malignant lesions) in the Jammu and Kashmir region of North India. The objectives of the study were to determine the association of p53 expression with the spectrum of gallbladder lesions.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Pathology at Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India, from June 2020 to December 2022. A total of 249 specimens of gallbladder lesions were included, comprising congenital, inflammatory, benign, pre-malignant, and malignant lesions. Since it was a cross-sectional study involving pathological specimens, ethical clearance was not required or waived. Furthermore, no patient data were disclosed.

Inclusion criteria: All cholecystectomy specimens obtained in the histopathological department of the hospital were included in the present study during the study period.

Exclusion criteria: Those patients with any other major co-morbid illness or those for whom a specific diagnosis regarding inflammatory, pre-malignant, benign or malignant conditions could not be made and patients who refused to participate in the study were excluded from the study.

Sample size: The study by Pavani M et al., observed that p53 expression was present in 16.67% of patients (9). Taking this value as a reference, the minimum required sample size, with a 5% margin of error and a 5% level of significance, is 214 patients. To reduce the margin of error, a total sample size of 249 was chosen.

Procedure

Age, gender, and presenting complaints of each patient were noted. Histopathological diagnoses were retrieved from the records. The histopathological specimens were fixed in 10% formalin and embedded in wax. Slides were prepared and stained with haematoxylin and eosin. The slides were independently examined by a histopathologist under light microscopy (12). The grading of cell differentiation for malignant types was performed according to World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria, classifying them as well-differentiated, moderately differentiated, or poorly differentiated (11). Blocks and sections were retrieved from the collection for performing p53 IHC to assess nuclear positivity.

p53 immunostaining was conducted using the biotin-streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase method. Two sections, each 2-4 μm thick, were prepared, with one serving as a negative control and the other used for immunostaining. p53 positive control cell slides from CELL MARQUE were used alongside each slide during the p53 expression assessment. The sections were de-paraffinised with xylene, rehydrated with graded alcohol, and washed with deionised water. Citrate buffer pretreatment was performed for antigen retrieval. Primary anti-p53 antibodies (Dako, Clone DO-7) were applied at a dilution of 1:50 and incubated for two hours at room temperature. Subsequently, incubation was carried out for 20 minutes with biotinylated anti-mouse/anti-rabbit secondary antibodies, followed by incubation with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated streptavidin (Alkaline Phosphatase Kit, Biogenex) for 20 minutes. Phosphate buffer saline was used for the negative controls. The sections were counterstained with Harris haematoxylin, covered with coverslips, and examined under the microscope for p53 expression, which was scored using a semi-quantitative method based on the incidence of positively stained cells (11).

Scoring was performed based on intensity, with values of 0, 1, 2, and 3 representing absent, mild, moderate, and intense staining, respectively. The percentage positivity was graded as absent, Grade-1, Grade-2, and Grade-3 for 0% cells, <10% cells, 10-50% cells, and >50% positive cells. Therefore, the total score ranged from 0 to 6, and a score of ≥3 was considered as positive 11overexpression of p53 (11). The final histopathological diagnosis and the association of p53 expression in inflammatory, benign, pre-malignant, and malignant lesions were determined statistically.

Statistical Analysis

The categorical variables were presented as “number and percentage (%)”. Meanwhile, the quantitative data were presented as “means±SD” and as the “median with 25th and 75th percentiles” (interquartile range). The association between p53 expression and histopathological diagnosis was analysed using Fisher’s Exact test. Data entry was performed in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet, and the final analysis was conducted using SPSS software, version 21.0, manufactured by IBM in Chicago, USA. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant for determining statistical significance.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 45.22±14.4 years. In the present study, 165 (66.27%) of the patients were females, and 84 (33.73%) were males. The symptoms reported included palpable mass in 210 cases (84.34%), jaundice in 206 cases (82.73%), and right upper quadrant pain in 200 cases (80.32%) (Table/Fig 1).

The main inflammatory lesions (n=217, 87.14%) consisted of 132 cases (60.83%) of Chronic Cholecystitis (CC), 36 cases (16.59%) of CC with cholesterosis, and 27 cases (12.44%) of CC with cholelithiasis. Among the pre-malignant lesions (n=9, 3.6%), three cases (33.33%) were choledochal cysts, and two cases (22.22%) each were CC with antral metaplasia, CC with focal adenomyomatosis, CC with intestinal metaplasia, CC with pyloric metaplasia, and CC with tubular metaplasia. Two cases (0.8%) of benign tumours (leiomyoma) were observed. Out of 21 cases (8.46%) of malignant tumours, four cases (19.05%) were moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, 13 cases (61.9%) were poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, and four cases (19.05%) were well-differentiated adenocarcinoma (Table/Fig 2).

There was a significant overexpression of p53 in malignant gallbladder lesions (p=0.003). p53 overexpression was observed in 26 cases (11.98%) of inflammatory lesions and nine cases (42.86%) of malignant tumours. There was no p53 overexpression in benign tumours and pre-malignant lesions. Among the malignant tumours, p53 overexpression was present in eight cases of poorly differentiated carcinoma and one case of moderately differentiated carcinoma
(Table/Fig 3). Representative case images are shown in (Table/Fig 4),(Table/Fig 5),(Table/Fig 6),(Table/Fig 7).

Gross photographs of radical cholecystectomy specimens of carcinoma gallbladder mostly showed a markedly thickened gallbladder wall with grey-white areas and friable intraluminal growth (Table/Fig 4). Microscopically, carcinoma of the gallbladder exhibited wall infiltration with malignant glands (Table/Fig 5). Photomicrographs showed p53 nuclear staining in benign (Table/Fig 6) and malignant lesions (Table/Fig 7).

Discussion

The spectrum of gallbladder lesions exhibited a wide variation from non-malignant to malignant conditions. Overall, the mean age of all the patients was 45.22±14.4 years. This is in line with a study conducted in South India by Pavani M et al., where the age of patients ranged from 18 to 72 years, with a mean age of 46.3 years at the time of presentation (9). In patients with malignant lesions, the mean age was 51.5 years. This finding is consistent with the mean age of 45.77±14.65 years at presentation reported in studies by Mushtaq M et al., and Vahini G and Premalatha P. (1),(13). Gallbladder diseases are more commonly observed in women, and middle-aged individuals are most frequently affected.

Females (165, 66.27%) outnumbered males (84, 33.73%) in the present study, as the incidence of gallbladder lesions was higher in females compared to males. This finding is consistent with the study conducted by Pavani M et al., where females were found to be more affected than males, with a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.2 (9). Similar findings were reported by Patel AM et al., (M:F=1:1.25), Jha RK and Yadav DP (M:F=1:4), and Selvi RT et al., (M:F=1:1.6) (14),(15),(16). Factors that may contribute to the formation of gallstones in females include female sex hormones, particularly estrogen, and a sedentary lifestyle (17). Estrogen has been shown to increase the secretion of biliary cholesterol in the liver, leading to increased bile cholesterol saturation and the formation of cholesterol gallstones (18).

The majority of cases in the present study were inflammatory lesions (217, 87.14%). The main inflammatory lesions observed were Chronic Cholecystitis (CC) in 132 cases (60.83%), CC with cholesterosis in 36 cases (16.59%), and CC with cholelithiasis in 27 cases (12.44%). These findings are similar to those reported by Pavani M et al., who found that the predominant lesions were inflammatory lesions (84.70%), precursor lesions (10.70%), and malignant lesions (4.58%) (9). CC is the most common gallbladder disease and the primary indication for cholecystectomy. In their study, they found that patients presented with acute cholecystitis as well as acute-on-chronic cholecystitis. Similar findings were also reported by Kumari NS et al., where the most commonly observed gallbladder lesions were chronic calculous cholecystitis (405, 73.64%) (5). Other lesions included chronic cholecystitis (85, 15.45%), acute-on-chronic cholecystitis with stones (18 cases, 3.27%), and without stones (3, 0.55%) (Table/Fig 8) (1),(2),(5),(9),(13),(14),(15),(16),(19),(20),(21),(22).

The majority of cholecystitis cases are reported to be associated with cholelithiasis, which is a common disorder affecting 10% to 20% of adults (13),(15). Recurrent inflammation leads to fibrosis and thickening of the gallbladder wall. CC and other conditions such as adenomyosis, gallstones, and xanthogranulomatous reactions have been reported to be associated with metaplasia (9),(13),(15),(16),(19). Several risk factors related to cholecystitis include advanced age, female gender, obesity, ethnicity, pregnancy, use of oral contraceptives, and diabetes mellitus [15,16]. Recurrent episodes of acute cholecystitis can lead to the development of CC, with the majority of cases being associated with gallstones (23).

In the present study, a total of nine cases (3.6%) of pre-malignant lesions were identified. Among these, three cases (33.33%) were choledochal cysts, two cases (22.22%) were CC with antral metaplasia, and CC with focal adenomyomatosis, CC with intestinal metaplasia, CC with pyloric metaplasia, and CC with tubular metaplasia were each present in one case (11.11%). Similar findings were reported by Pavani M et al., who found cases of pre-malignant lesions such as choledochal cysts (n=8, 3.05%), cystadenomas (n=3, 11.4%), and polyps (n=2, 0.76%) (9). Consistent results were also reported in the study by Shukla SK et al., (Table/Fig 8) (19).

Gallbladder polyps larger than 1.5 cm are associated with a 50% risk of malignancy (24). Choledochal cysts are also linked to a greater risk of progressing to malignancy, even in the absence of inflammatory risk factors such as gallstones. Patients with these lesions may develop Gallbladder Cancer (GBC) at an earlier age (18). GBC is a rare but the most common malignancy of the biliary tract, accounting for 80% to 95% of all biliary tract carcinomas and ranking as the fifth most common gastrointestinal malignancy (25). In the present study, the authors focused on the incidence of gallbladder carcinoma in the Jammu and Kashmir region of North India. Among the 21 (8.46%) malignant tumours identified, 4 (19.05%) were poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, 13 (61.90%) were moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, and 4 (19.05%) were well-differentiated adenocarcinoma. In a study by Pavani M et al., 4.6% (n=12) of the cases were malignant, including well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, and poorly differentiated carcinomas (9). Additionally, two malignant cases were incidentally discovered during cholecystectomy procedures performed for cholecystitis. The overall mean survival was six months, with a 5-year survival rate of 5%. These findings are consistent with the results reported by Terada T and Sharma A et al., (2),(25). Early diagnosis is crucial for appropriate management and a better prognosis. GBC progresses silently, and with delayed diagnosis, it is often fatal.

Surgery is the only curative option for gallbladder cancer. Early detection is extremely rare and typically occurs incidentally. Late presentation is associated with advanced staging, nodal involvement, and a higher risk of recurrence after resection (25). There is a close association between chronic inflammation and neoplasia, as repeated or persistent inflammation can induce, promote, or increase susceptibility to carcinogenesis. Chronic inflammation damages DNA, stimulates tissue reparative proliferation, and creates a stromal environment enriched with cytokines and growth factors (26).

The p53 gene, encoded on chromosome 17p, plays a key role in regulating cell proliferation, and mutational inactivation of p53 promotes carcinogenesis and the progression of malignancy (9). While the role of the p53 tumour suppressor gene has been studied in various cancers, its specific role in the pathogenesis of gallbladder cancer is still unknown (27). Abnormalities in p53 are commonly observed in gallbladder cancer pathogenesis, starting from chronic cholecystitis. Inflammation may contribute to early alterations in p53, possibly through increased cell turnover and oxidative stress, although the exact mechanism is not yet fully understood. The most common genetic alteration in gallbladder cancer is inactivation of the TP53 gene, which can occur through mutation or deletion. Alterations in TP53 disrupt the architecture of the epithelium, leading to the progression of metaplasia to invasive carcinoma (27).

The authors found that p53 expression was significantly associated with the histopathological diagnosis. p53 expression was more prevalent in patients with malignant lesions compared to those with inflammatory, benign, and pre-malignant lesions (42.86% vs. 11.98% vs. 0% vs. 0%, p=0.003). Furthermore, p53 expression was higher in poorly differentiated and moderately differentiated adenocarcinomas compared to well-differentiated adenocarcinoma. These findings are consistent with some previous studies. Pavani M et al., found p53 expression present in 50% of malignant lesions (9). No p53 expression was found in early or well-differentiated adenocarcinomas, but strong p53 expression was observed in poorly differentiated and moderately differentiated carcinomas. This is similar to the observations of Roa I et al., who also reported p53 expression in nearly 50% of advanced cancers compared to early carcinomas (28). In the study by Oohashi Y et al., it was mentioned that p53 protein overexpression is an early event in carcinogenesis and this alteration is maintained during its progression (29). Similar findings were reported by Kaur D et al., who found that overexpression of p53 is associated with an increased grade of gallbladder cancer, suggesting a role for p53 in tumour progression rather than initiation (30). Wang HH et al., also reported a role of aberrant p53 expression in the occurrence of gallbladder cancer (18). Ghosh M et al., found that there was an increase in p53 expression with increasing tumour grade (21). p53 overexpression was present in 56.25% of gallbladder cancer cases, while no overexpression was observed in cases of chronic cholecystitis or control gallbladders. Kaur D et al., reported an inverse relationship between p53 overexpression and tumour grade (30). The histological grade of p53-positive adenocarcinomas was significantly different from p53-negative adenocarcinomas, with a higher proportion of poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas in patients with p53 overexpression. Singh A et al., reported that among 60 cases of gallbladder carcinoma, 22 (36.67%) cases demonstrated strong HER-2 overexpression, while 20 (33.3%) cases showed positivity for p53 in tumour cases, which was associated with a poor outcome (22).

The authors found that p53 expression was positive in 26 (11.98%) out of 217 inflammatory lesions. Among other studies, Pavani M et al., reported that 11.8% of the cases had p53 expression in chronic cholecystitis cases with a thickened and inflamed gallbladder wall (9). Similar findings were observed in the study by Kanoh K et al., where p53 expression was present in 14.3% of the inflammatory conditions (31). It was suggested that chronic cholecystitis with a thick and sclerotic wall, resulting from repeated inflammation, may be an early change leading to carcinogenesis. Yanagisawa N et al., found the presence of sporadic p53 transition mutations in non-neoplastic lesions such as severe cholecystitis, suggesting the significance of the sequence from chronic cholecystitis to gallbladder cancer carcinogenesis (8). In a study evaluating the effect of chronic inflammation and gallstones on gallbladder carcinogenesis, it was proposed that chronic inflammation of the gallbladder at the molecular level may result in p53 heterozygosity loss and excessive p53 protein expression (32). Kanoh K et al., also reported that chronic contracted cholecystitis with a thickened and sclerotic wall was a risk factor for carcinogenesis (31). Among the pre-malignant lesions, p53 expression was not positive in any case in the present study. Similarly, Chaube A et al., found that p53 overexpression was not observed in any pre-malignant lesions (20). It was suggested that the role of p53 is limited in determining the initiation of gallbladder carcinogenesis.

Limitation(s)

Firstly, the authors did not assess the expression of any other markers. Additionally, the authors did not conduct a follow-up of the patients to determine the outcomes and their association with p53 expression.

Conclusion

In conclusion, p53 can be considered as a novel marker for differentiation between benign and malignant lesions of the gallbladder, as its expression is significantly increased in malignant lesions. It may also serve as a supportive marker for distinguishing between different grades of differentiation. This has important implications in clinical practice, where the frequent use of p53 as a diagnostic tool can help prevent the misdiagnosis of malignant gallbladder lesions and ultimately improve patient outcomes.

References

1.
Mushtaq M, Sharma T, Sharma K. Histopathological spectrum of gall bladder diseases after laparoscopic cholecystectomy- A retrospective study. Indian J Basic Appl Med Res. 2017;7(1):414-19.
2.
Terada T. Histopathologic features and frequency of gall bladder lesions in consecutive 540 cholecystectomies. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2013;6(1):91-96.
3.
Sachidananda S, Krishnan A, Janani K, Alexander PC, Velayutham V, Rajagopal S, et al. Characteristics of gallbladder cancer in South India. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2012;3(3):228-30. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Lobo L, Kishan Prasad HL, Satoskar RR. Carcinoma of the gall bladder: A prospective study in a tertiary hospital of Bombay, India. J Clin of Diagn Res. 2012;6(4):692-95.
5.
Kumari NS, Sireesha A, Srujana S, Kumar O. Cholecystectomies- A 1.5 year histopathological study. IAIM. 2016;3(9):134-39.
6.
Li Y, Zhang J, Ma H. Chronic inflammation and gallbladder cancer. Cancer Lett. 2014;345(2):242-48. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Rivlin N, Brosh R, Oren M, Rotter V. Mutations in the p53 tumour suppressor gene: Important milestones at the various steps of tumourigenesis. Genes Cancer. 2011;2(4):466-74. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Yanagisawa N, Mikami T, Koike M, Okayasu I. Enhanced cell kinetics, p53 accumulation and high p21WAF1 expression in chronic cholecystitis: Comparison with background mucosa of gallbladder carcinomas. Histopathol. 2000;36(1):54-61. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Pavani M, Anunayi J, Vivekanand N, Deshpande AK. Histomorphological spectrum of gall bladder lesions, relation to p53 expression. Indian J Pathol Oncol. 2020;7(2):235-42. [crossref]
10.
Barreto SG, Dutt A, Chaudhary A. A genetic model for gallbladder carcinogenesis and its dissemination. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(6):1086-97. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Hidalgo Grau LA, Badia JM, Salvador CA, Monsó TS, Canaleta JF, Nogués JM, et al. Gallbladder carcinoma: The role of p53 protein overexpression and Ki-67 antigen expression as prognostic markers. HPB (Oxford). 2004;6(3):174-80. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Ghosh M, Sakhuja P, Singh S, Agarwal AK. p53 and beta-catenin expression in gallbladder tissues and correlation with tumour progression in gallbladder cancer. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(1):34-39. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Vahini G, Premalatha P. Clinicopathological study of gallbladder lesions. J Dent Med Sci. 2015;14(2):15-20.
14.
Patel AM, Yeola M, Mahakalkar C. Demographic and risk factor profile in patients of gallstone disease in Central India. Cureus. 2022;14(5):e24993. [crossref]
15.
Jha RK, Yadav DP. Frequency of gall bladder diseases in 200 cholecystectomies lesions. Int J Curr Res Med Sci. 2017;3(12):39-44. [crossref]
16.
Selvi RT, Sinha P, Subramaniam PM. A clinicopathological study of cholecystitis with special reference to analysis of cholelithiasis. Int J Basic Med Sci. 2011;2(2):68-72.
17.
Kim SB, Kim KH, Kim TN, Heo J, Jung MK, Cho CM, et al. Sex differences in prevalence and risk factors of asymptomatic cholelithiasis in Korean health screening examinee: A retrospective analysis of a multicenter study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(13):e6477. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Wang HH, Liu M, Clegg DJ, Portincasa P, Wang DQ. New insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying effects of estrogen on cholesterol gallstone formation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1791(11):1037-47. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Shukla SK, Singh G, Shahi KS, Bhuvan, Pant P. Genetic changes of P53 and Kras in gallbladder carcinoma in Kumaon Region of Uttarakhand. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2020;51(2):552-59. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Chaube A, Tewari M, Garbyal RS, Singh U, Shukla HS. Preliminary study of p53 and c-erbB-2 expression in gallbladder cancer in Indian patients. BMC Cancer. 2006;6(1):126. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Ghosh M, Sakhuja P, Singh S, Agarwal AK. p53 and beta-catenin expression in gallbladder tissues and correlation with tumour progression in gallbladder cancer. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(1):34-39. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Singh A, Mishra PK, Saluja SS, Talikoti MA, Kirtani P, Najmi AK. Prognostic significance of HER-2 and p53 expression in gallbladder carcinoma in North Indian patients. Oncology. 2016;91(6):354-60. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Laurila JJ, Ala-Kokko TI, Laurila PA, Saarnio J, Koivukangas V, Syrjala H, et al. Histopathology of acute acalculous cholecystitis in critically ill patients. Histopathol. 2005;47(5):485-92. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Andrén-Sandberg A. Diagnosis and management of gallbladder polyps. North Am J Med Sci. 2012;4(5):203-11. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Sharma A, Sharma KL, Gupta A, Yadav A. Gallbladder cancer epidemiology, pathogenesis and molecular genetics. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(22):3978-98. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Singh N, Baby D, Rajguru JP, Patil PB, Thakkannavar SS, Pujari VB. Inflammation and cancer. Ann Afr Med. 2019;18(3):121-26. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Takano A, Nakagomi H, Ikegame K, Yamamoto A, Watanabe H, Nakada H, et al. Report of a case with gallbladder carcinoma: P53 expression of the peritumour epithelium might predict biliary tract recurrence. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2016;28:325-29. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.10.042. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Roa I, Villaseca M, Araya JC, Roa J, de Aretxabala X, Fuentealba P, et al. DNA ploidy pattern and tumour suppressor gene p53 expression in gall bladder carcinoma, cancer epidemiology, biomarkers and prevention. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997;6(7):547-50.
29.
Oohashi Y, Watanabe H, Ajioka Y, Hatakeyama K. p53 immunostaining distinguishes malignant from benign lesions of the gall-bladder. Pathol Int. 1995;45(1):58-65. [PubMed]>[crossref]
30.
Kaur D, Agarwal T, Garg T, Sagar SK. Histopathological study of gall bladder malignancies with special reference to p53 expression. Int J Pathol Oncol. 2020;7(1):147-51. [crossref]
31.
Kanoh K, Shimura T, Tsutsumi S, Suzuki H, Kashiwabara K, Nakajima T, et al. Significance of contracted cholecystitis lesions as high risk for gallbladder carcinogenesis. Cancer Lett. 2001;169(1):07-14. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Tazuma S, Kajiyama G. Carcinogenesis of malignant lesions of the gall bladder. The impact of chronic inflammation and gallstones. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2001;386(3):224-29.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/66785.18967

Date of Submission: Jul 28, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Sep 18, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Nov 28, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? NA
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 29, 2023
• Manual Googling: Oct 13, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Nov 21, 2023 (13%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com